If you have been following the latest happenings around the world, it would be frighteningly obvious that we have in our midst global twisters of social, political, economical and environmental crises all seeming to coallesce to create a perfect storm of creative destruction so as to herald a New World Order out of these Global Disorders. What troubles me so deeply, is that the trajectories of these crises are being steered and governed by a set of belief systems that are dysfunctional at their core as they are totally detached from the life ground that underpins the integrity and sustainability of our social and planetary life supporting systems, and as a result will produce consequences and more negative outcomes that were not intended (I hope) by the apologists of these systems.
If you have been following my blogs over the past year, you would have noted that my thoughts and ruminations have gravitated to the analysis and insights of Prof John McMurtry’s work which has revealed to us that our social, political and economic belief systems are based on a regulating and operating syntax that has institutionalised money value over life value. As a result, we have inherited a political-economic-social system that is not fit for life purpose. There have been many attempts to identify the false assumptions and false credos of this dysfunctional belief and value system, but none has come close to addressing the ultimate cause as Prof McMurtry’s Life-Value Onto-Axiology (LVOA) with his identification of our dysfunctional Ruling Value System (RVS).
LVOA = Life-Value Onto-Axiology – The value-system which regards life and means of life to more coherently comprehensive ranges of life as the ultimate and universal good. (Also referred to as life-value onto-ethic when emphasis is on the normative dimension of the axiology.)
RVS = Ruling Value System – A society’s value-system presupposed by those governed by it which ultimately regulates the decision norms and goals of the society’s dominant social institutions, individual roles within them, and the thought structure of those internalizing it.
from John McMurtry, Philosophy and World Problems, Volume I, UNESCO in partnership with Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems: Oxford: Eolss Publishers, 2011.
Although his work is solid and has informed immensely my understanding of why our present system is dysfunctional, and how such a system can be made whole again based on life-value inclusive coherent principles, I am at a loss of why his insights have not gone mainstream given the evidence in our midst that this phase of human experimentation and exploitation have done more harm than good to the social fabric and life supporting system of our communities and planet. His explanation that our dysfunctional belief systems are fundamentally life-blind based on a regulating group-mind, is for me, unsatisfactory as an explanation, as it presupposes this life-blindness in the first place. He writes:
“What do the following phenomena have in common – the Pushtan honor code, the Spanish Inquisition, female genital mutilation, and academic mobbing? They variously express the value syntax of the regulating or ruling group mind (RGM). The RGM is a discrete structure of thinking which underlies diverse levels of collectively life-destructive behavior which are otherwise anomalous and unconnected – from such practices as the above to caging harmless offenders to normalized regimes of exogenous homicide. The RGM mechanism may be understood as the direct opposite of conscious social organization for the life security of members. Unrestricted to any culture or period, the RGM is recognized and defined by an always distinguishing set of generic properties: (i) life-blind and destructive behaviors at micro or macro levels on the basis of (ii) a ruling set of group presuppositions which (iii) frame social ideation and communication to (iv) select only for what confirms them and (v) invalidate what does not to (vi) generate stereotypes and myths as replacement standards which (vii) reinforce and confer claims of the group’s superiority in virtue of its inherent moral order which is conceived as (viii) equivalent to laws of Nature, God or Reason which (ix) only malicious or less-than-human enemies reject who (x) are therefore warred upon in with-us-or-against us campaigns to impose the group’s ruling value program. While this set of characteristics is diversely expressed and admits of degrees of rigidity and extreme, the RGM is a unitary mechanism whose interlocking operations constitute (xi) a ruling mind-set of the mutual understanding of members and self-identity. While RGM formations are invariably confused with beneficial social order, these locked and life-destructive regulators mark it as pathological.”
from The Regulating Group‑Mind by Prof John McMurtry – Sage Encyclopedia of Case Study Research
What I have been searching for is a better understanding of why this blindness to life-value exists in all of our dysfunctional belief systems. What I have found as of late is that the answer to this puzzle lies within a deeper understanding of the neurobiology of our brain, which is the platform on which our belief systems operate, and at the deepest level yet, our best physical theories of the universe. Although one may think that value judgements can only be understood at the social level of life organisation, it appears that for a complete and comprehensively inclusive understanding of our world, a recovery from our life-blindness can only come by having our physical theories include consciousness at the fundamental level with life-value built-in at the deepest and broadest level possible. How is this possible? Does such a theory or world view exist that has empirical backing, is logical in its analysis and is fully life-coherent? What I endeavour to do is present exhibits to make a case that we have in our midst jigsaw pieces of this life puzzle that interlock and interconnect through and through to provide the answer. This case will be made by revealing the articles that “presented themselves” along the way to this discovery.
Exhibit 1: Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory.
Abstract
The nature of consciousness, the mechanism by which it occurs in the brain, and its ultimate place in the universe are unknown. We proposed in the mid 1990’s that consciousness depends on biologically ‘orchestrated’ coherent quantum processes in collections of microtubules within brain neurons, that these quantum processes correlate with, and regulate, neuronal synaptic and membrane activity, and that the continuous Schrödinger evolution of each such process terminates in accordance with the specific Diósi–Penrose (DP) scheme of ‘objective reduction’ (‘OR’) of the quantum state. This orchestrated OR activity (‘Orch OR’) is taken to result in moments of conscious awareness and/or choice. The DP form of OR is related to the fundamentals of quantum mechanics and space–time geometry, so Orch OR suggests that there is a connection between the brain’s biomolecular processes and the basic structure of the universe. Here we review Orch OR in light of criticisms and developments in quantum biology, neuroscience, physics and cosmology. We also introduce a novel suggestion of ‘beat frequencies’ of faster microtubule vibrations as a possible source of the observed electro-encephalographic (‘EEG’) correlates of consciousness. We conclude that consciousness plays an intrinsic role in the universe.
Exhibit 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction
“An essential feature of Penrose’s theory is that the choice of states when objective reduction occurs is selected neither randomly (as are choices following wave function collapse) nor algorithmically. Rather, states are selected by a “non-computable” influence embedded in the Planck scale of spacetime geometry. Penrose claimed that such information is Platonic, representing pure mathematical truth, aesthetic and ethical values at the Planck scale. This relates to Penrose’s ideas concerning the three worlds: physical, mental, and the Platonic mathematical world. In his theory, the Platonic world corresponds to the geometry of fundamental spacetime that is claimed to support non-computational thinking.”
Exhibit 3: Morality at the Planck Scale: A Chat with Stuart Hameroff
“Q: So how do you tie this into panpsychism?
A: Everything -matter, energy, you name it- comes from curvatures, patterns and other properties originating at the Planck scale. If consciousness does have some fundamental, irreducible precursor it must originate as some sort of pattern at the same basic level of the universe. Philosophers call the raw components of conscious experience qualia. We’re suggesting that qualia are specific patterns or properties at the Planck scale. Why not? If there’s something fundamental and irreducible about consciousness or its precursors, as Spinoza and Whitehead said, then it has to exist somewhere. The Planck scale is all there is.Q: But you usually don’t translate from that level to this one we’re living in. There isn’t a direct correlation.
A: Ah but there is. That’s the beauty of Roger’s objective reduction. It’s a bridge between the Planck scale and our everyday world, described by one simple equation-the uncertainty principle. Our brains, and our microtubules, make the connection. If our conscious experience is a compilation of fundamental qualia, then we’re like a painter with a palette. All the individual colors are on the palette, and the artist takes a little of this, a little of that, and gets a Mona Lisa. So the colors are like the patterns of fundamental spacetime geometry from which processes in our brain select particular sets for each conscious moment. And if qualia are fundamental and exist at the Planck scale, then why not Platonic values like truth and beauty, good and evil.Q: But you can already explain things like ethics, for instance, with Darwinian evolution. You don’t need this explanation.
A: Ideas about beauty, for example, may change, for various cultural reasons if nothing else. But mathematical truth is constant as far as we can tell. In any case, as Smolin points out, even the Planck scale structure of spin networks has a dynamic evolution.
Q: Then you’re a Platonist!
A: A Platonic naturalist I’d say, implying that Platonic values exist in a physical sense. That’s what makes sense to me.”“Q: How has all this theorizing affected your life?
A: It’s enhanced my spiritual nature. I more or less rejected organized religion a long time ago. I like the idea that spirituality and God and consciousness could be part of the universe in a scientific way. I’m not saying we’ve explained these concepts because the more we learn the more we realize we don’t know. It’s very humbling to peel off one layer and find out how much more there is. Just consider the vastness at the Planck scale. If you take the sum total of this nonlocal, interconnected information and the idea of embedded Platonic values, that’s pretty consistent with the idea of an omniscient, omnipresent, beneficent being.Q: So is evil at the Planck scale?
A: Either evil is implicit at the Planck scale along with good, or evil people are wired differently biologically for whatever reason and are influenced in an aberrant way. But even so-called good people must allow themselves to be influenced by Platonic values rather than ignoring or over-riding them due to some needs or gratification.“
Abstract:
The “hidden variables” or “guiding equation” explanation for the measurement of quantum nonlocality (entanglement) effects can be interpreted as instantiation of Platonic information. Because these Bohm-deBroglie principles are already external to the material objects that they theoretically affect, interpreting them as Platonic is feasible.
Taking an approach partially suggested by Quantum Information Theory which views quantum phenomena as sometimes observable-measurable information, this thesis defines hidden variables/guiding equation as information. This approach enables us to bridge the divide between the abstract Platonic realm and the physical world. The unobservable quantum wavefunction collapse is interpreted as Platonic instantiation. At each interaction, the wave function for a quantum system collapses. Instantly, Platonic information is instantiated in the system.
Exhibit 5: A NEW CONCEPT OF ARCHETYPE IN THE PHYSICS OF SELF-ORGANIZATION by
Leonardo CHIATTI
Abstract
This article aims to reformulate the concepts of “archetype” and “entelechy” starting from modern notions of microphysics. It proposes an experimental scheme able to verify the actual existence of such entities under an assumption of final causality, successively reinterpreted as a particular form of efficient causality. The possibility of connections with the domains of the ontogenesis and phylogenesis of living systems is discussed. Subsequently, the scheme is generalized in order to include a concept of psychosomatic connection.
Exhibit 6: HYLOZOISM, TRIADICITY, MANIFESTATION: ECHOES FROM THE MICROWORLD by Leonardo CHIATTI
One thought on “The (Un)Intended Consequences of Dysfunctional Belief Systems”