Israel’s Strategic Autopsy (PPT) (PDF)

Israel at a Dead End (PPT) (PDF)

 

Deep Dive | Gideon Levy on Israel’s Military Trap

https://bsahely.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Gideon_Levy_on_Israels_Military_Trap.mp3?_=1

Debate | Master Plan or Strategic Chaos in Gaza

https://bsahely.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Master_Plan_or_Strategic_Chaos_in_Gaza.mp3?_=2

Critique | Sharpening an Israeli Journalist’s War Critique

https://bsahely.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Sharpening_an_Israeli_Journalist_s_War_Critique.mp3?_=3

Video Explainer | Inside the Conflict

Cinematic Explainer | The Architecture of Denial

Please click on the infographic to enlarge

Analysis of Israeli Military Policy and Society in Gaza and Lebanon

Please scroll to the right to see the right column

Conflict Zone	Military Strategy	Israeli Societal Perspective	Impact on Local Populations	Humanitarian Status	US Involvement and Aid Policy	Long-term Political Vision (Inferred)
Gaza	Systematic destruction of all villages; total crushing of Palestinian society and institutions to create anarchy; pushing populations south to force displacement.	Status of denial and apathy; belief that Gaza is a society of terrorists; majority believes they have the right to do anything after October 7th.	Over 2 million people displaced and living in tents; trauma and permanent displacement of families; lack of electricity and medicine.	Total lack of citizenship or passports for 2.5 million people; absence of functional institutions; population living in agony and misery.	Full partnership in military operations; provision of unconditional aid (technology, ammunition, arms); failure to use leverage or condition aid.	A "final solution" involving the expulsion of Palestinians and takeover of land, leaving the population without heritage or identity.
West Bank	Uprooting Palestinians; tyrannical methods used to push people out; taking over land and economy; systematic killing of civilians (including infants).	Deep denial of the 59-year occupation; legitimization of sadism and racist ideology; refusal to discuss the occupation in mainstream media.	Loss of land to settlements; restriction of movement; living under threat of military violence; economic strangulation.	Living under brutal military occupation without basic rights; treated as non-citizens; subjection to settler and military violence.	Passive partnership through failure to stop the settlement project; refusal to make aid conditional on stopping illegal expansion.	Expansion of the state's reach to claim more real estate; permanent apartheid or eventual expulsion similar to the 1948 Nakba.
Lebanon	Systematic destruction of villages; bombardment of cities such as Beirut; strategy identical to Gaza without a clear purpose or endgame.	Apathetic support for military force; belief that only the "language of power" is understood; automatic support for wars over diplomatic solutions.	1 million people uprooted and displaced; widespread death and destruction of civilian infrastructure.	Large-scale displacement; lack of safety due to ballistic missile exchanges and constant aerial bombardment.	Continued supply of high-end military devices and arms that enable "wild" military adventures without existential risk to Israel.	Use of military force to attempt regional regime change and disconnect proxies from Iran, despite these goals being historically unachievable.

Click on Master Diagram to enlarge | ChatGPT-5.5 High

---

NotebookLM Deep Research on Themes raised in the interview

The Collapse of Strategic Rationality: Geopolitical and Societal Dimensions of Israel’s Permanent War Posture

The military escalations in Gaza and Lebanon have brought the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a critical historical juncture, precipitating what numerous international observers and domestic critics describe as an existential crisis for the State of Israel.[1] Rather than steering toward a diplomatic resolution, contemporary Israeli policy remains anchored in military coercion, characterized by a lack of long-term political objectives and an unyielding commitment to force.[2, 3] This strategic default is sustained internally by a powerful psychosocial infrastructure of societal denial and media propaganda, and externally by the unconditional patronage of the United States.[4, 5]

Beneath immediate tactical maneuvers lies a deeply rooted historical and ideological framework—one that prioritizes maximalist territorial expansion, demographic engineering, and unilateral conflict management over negotiated compromise.[6, 7, 8] This report provides an exhaustive geopolitical risk assessment of Israel’s current military trajectory, its domestic political radicalization, the complicity of its judicial institutions, and the systemic factors that render simple leadership transitions insufficient to alter the state’s strategic path.[7, 8, 9]

---

The Strategic Vacuum: Defaulting to Kinetic Force in Gaza and Lebanon

The contemporary Israeli state functions under a deeply embedded national mindset where military force is consistently treated as the first option rather than a diplomatic last resort.[3] This socio-political culture, which critics have likened to a highly militarized “super Sparta,” defaults to security-centric operations while systematically sidelining diplomatic alternatives.[3, 10] Historically, this militarism relied on highly differentiated patterns of state coercion.[11] During the late twentieth century, for instance, conscripts rotating between the occupation of southern Lebanon and the Palestinian territories adjusted their tactical severity based on explicit and tacit regional signals.[11] Common shoot-on-sight ambush tactics in Lebanon in the 1980s were strictly forbidden in the West Bank or Gaza, which in turn relied on different coercion models compared to Israel proper.[11] These variations were organized not solely along geographic lines, but also by nationality, treating Jews and Arabs differently regardless of locale.[11]

Over successive decades of prolonged occupation, these regional distinctions have collapsed into a singular, undifferentiated application of maximal kinetic force across both occupied territories and neighboring sovereign states, utilizing mechanisms like unilaterally declared “yellow lines” inside Lebanese territory to demarcate zones of control.[8, 12, 13] This total collapse of geographic and tactical constraint is evident in the direct targeting of civilian infrastructure.[14, 15] UN Special Rapporteurs on human rights have documented systemic physical destruction, noting how cities like Rafah, Beit Jala, and Shu’afat have seen extensive demolition of housing and property, while Jericho was physically isolated through trenches cutting off access roads.[15, 16, 17]

This contemporary militaristic default contrasts sharply with the strategic realism that occasionally influenced past leadership.[2] It was the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin who privately admitted that the main consideration driving him to initiate the Oslo peace process was a clear-sighted realization of the limits of Israeli power.[2] Today’s strategy actively rejects this realism, driving the nation toward an escalating regional confrontation that exposes the home front to unprecedented missile threats for which the civilian infrastructure is deeply unprepared.[2] Strategists who push for military options against regional adversaries like Iran promote strategies that represent an existential threat to Israel’s survival, as the home-front vulnerabilities exposed during the Second Lebanon War were only a minor precursor to what a full-scale multi-directional missile onslaught would entail.[2]

For nearly two decades, Israel’s strategy toward Gaza was defined by the doctrine of “mowing the lawn”—a conflict-management paradigm predicated on periodic, high-intensity military campaigns designed to temporarily degrade the capabilities of Palestinian armed groups without addressing the underlying political grievances.[18, 19] However, the events of October 7, 2023, triggered a fundamental shift in this operational doctrine.[18, 19] The objective transitioned from cyclical containment to a campaign aimed at making the Gaza Strip structurally unlivable, thereby inducing the “voluntary” outward migration of its population.[13, 19] This shift is illustrated by the systematic physical and humanitarian destruction of the territory, which has transformed Gaza into what Amira Hass describes as the embodiment of the entire saga of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.[1]

Tactical Indicator	Cyclical Containment Era (Pre-2023)	Total Uninhabitability Era (Post-2023)
Primary Objective	Degrade armed resistance capabilities temporarily (“mowing the lawn”).[18, 19]	Complete structural obliteration to prevent the return of civilian life.[13, 19]
Territorial Strategy	Maintain external blockade while keeping settlers out of Gaza.[16, 20]	Internal military partitioning, clearing of land, and preparation for permanent zones of control.[13, 19]
Operational Scope	Targeted aerial strikes combined with localized ground incursions.[1, 21]	Unprecedented bombardment equivalent to several nuclear weapons, targeting 92% of housing.[22]
Population Management	Manage humanitarian aid flows to maintain a bare-minimum baseline of survival.[21, 23]	Engineered starvation, complete water and electricity cuts, and total physical displacement.[14]

In Lebanon, military actions have similarly lacked a clear political off-ramp, operating on a high-risk logic of deterrence through massive infrastructure destruction and civilian displacement.[3, 12] This reliance on overwhelming kinetic force, absent any constructive regional diplomatic agenda, reinforces a destructive “oppression-resistance cycle” that structurally criminalizes resistance while perpetuating permanent instability.[24, 25] This has led regional actors, such as Hezbollah’s leadership, to characterize Israel’s military campaign as a roadmap to annihilate civilian populations, ensuring that northern border communities remain permanently insecure as long as regional diplomacy is sidelined in favor of military force.[12]

---

The Psychosocial Infrastructure: Societal Denial and Media Propaganda

A critical enabler of Israel’s military strategy is the profound societal denial that insulates the domestic public from the humanitarian consequences of state policy.[4, 26] This internal psychological buffer is maintained through a media landscape that largely abandoned objective journalism post-October 7, 2023, transforming into an agent of nationalistic emotions and a de facto public relations agency for the military.[4] Mainstream commercial outlets voluntarily engage in extensive self-censorship, choosing to hide the physical reality of Gaza’s destruction from the Israeli public.[3, 4] The media feeds consumers an exclusive narrative diet of soldier heroism and the plight of Israeli captives, while systematically omitting coverage of the dying children, mass displacement, and total physical obliteration occurring mere miles away.[4] This active concealment functions as a highly effective mechanism for the dehumanization of Palestinians, allowing the domestic population to remain at peace with the reality of occupation and war.[4, 18]

This media-driven dehumanization has fostered deep-seated public indifference.[4, 27] The historical trajectory of this apathy is marked by a stark decay in moral sensitivity.[27, 28] In 1989, a report by journalist Gideon Levy detailing how a Palestinian woman lost her infant at a military checkpoint could shock the domestic public and prompt formal discussions in cabinet meetings.[28] By contrast, contemporary public opinion went ballistic when critics attempted to humanize the victims or challenge the conduct of the military.[27] Domestic support for military campaigns routinely ranges between 87% and 95%, while dissenting voices are subject to aggressive social and political marginalization.[27]

This social dynamic has normalized what critics term a “country of blood” ideology—the fatalistic belief that the state’s continued existence depends on a permanent blood offering, requiring recurring military campaigns in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank in perpetuity.[18] Because the material standard of living within Israel remains high—characterized by consumerism, vacations, and relative insulation from the direct costs of the occupation—the average citizen has little economic or moral incentive to demand a political alternative.[26]

This societal denial also infects liberal Zionist circles, exposing the deep contradictions within the domestic peace movement.[27, 29] Public intellectuals like Amos Oz historically described the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a Sophoclean tragedy over land—a battle of “right versus right”.[27] However, the brutality of the ongoing occupation has forced even moderate critics to acknowledge that the situation has deteriorated into a battle of “wrong versus wrong”.[27]

Furthermore, as noted in analyses of the national condition, even “bleeding-heart Israeli liberals” engage in systematic denial by expressing outrage at the injustices faced by present-day Palestinians while failing to address the foundational consequences of the 1948 Nakba.[29] To confront the Nakba would require acknowledging the original displacement upon which the state was founded, a concession that the vast majority of the public, regardless of their political alignment, remains unwilling to make.[29]

---

Geopolitical Alignment, Logistical Dependency, and the U.S. Patronage Axis

The structural viability of Israel’s current strategy is inextricably linked to the unconditional diplomatic, financial, and military support of the United States.[5, 10] This relationship represents a unique historical anomaly, as Israel receives billions in annual U.S. assistance without being held accountable for how those resources are deployed.[5] This unconditional blank check creates an acute moral hazard, insulating Israel from the immediate geopolitical costs of its policies, such as the continuous expansion of illegal settlements on private Palestinian land.[5, 20] U.S. diplomatic protection has routinely shielded Israel from international accountability, effectively giving the state a free hand to pursue military objectives without making territorial or political concessions.[5, 30]

Despite nationalist rhetoric from right-wing Israeli ministers claiming the nation can fight regional adversaries independently, military-logistical analysis demonstrates that Israel lacks the structural capacity to sustain prolonged, high-intensity regional conflicts without foreign assistance.[10, 31] The Israel Defense Forces are entirely dependent on the United States for critical munitions, sophisticated weaponry, and military spare parts.[10] Any interruption in this logistical supply chain, particularly during active multi-front operations, would rapidly degrade Israel’s operational readiness.[10, 32]

Strategic Dimension	Structural Dependence Indicator	Geopolitical Consequence
Military Logistics	Complete reliance on U.S. jet parts, precision guidance systems, and heavy munitions.[10, 32]	Tactical paralysis if the supply of spare parts or munitions is slowed or conditioned.[10, 32]
Diplomatic Shield	Consistent U.S. vetoes in the UN Security Council and opposition to international court rulings.[5, 33]	Total insulation from formal international sanctions, allowing the state to disregard global legal orders.[5, 33]
Financial Subsidies	Unaccountable multi-billion dollar annual aid packages.[5]	Indirect subsidization of settlement expansion in the West Bank and Gaza blockade infrastructure.[5, 20]
Bilateral Backlash	Growing friction with major Western allies and domestic political pressure in donor nations.[34, 35]	Severe erosion of Western moral authority and the growing isolation of the state on the global stage.[1, 12, 34]

The growing friction between the two allies indicates that this unconditional backing is increasingly fragile.[32] This vulnerability is underscored by private diplomatic exchanges.[12] For instance, during periods of intensive bombardment of neighboring capitals, senior U.S. officials, including Donald Trump, privately warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that unchecked military aggression was driving Israel into catastrophic global isolation, stating bluntly that the state’s political leadership was only insulated from direct legal and political consequences by the shield of American patronage.[12]

Furthermore, this unwavering alignment has generated profound global backlash, severely damaging the international credibility of Western states, fueling regional extremist recruitment, and accelerating the broader decline of Western geopolitical influence.[5, 34, 35] This has forced citizens and grassroots organizations in allied countries like the United Kingdom to engage in direct action against arms infrastructure, challenging their own governments’ refusal to honor international obligations to prevent state-sponsored violence.[34]

---

The Domestic Radicalization Spectrum: Theology, Demography, and Judicial Consent

The trajectory of Israel’s state policy is heavily steered by the ascendance of extreme right-wing, ultra-orthodox Zionist nationalists, commonly known as Hardal.[13] This political movement, represented by figures such as Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, champions an ideology of explicit Jewish supremacy and maximalist territorial expansion across the biblical Land of Israel.[13, 36] Within this theological framework, any territorial concession is viewed as a grave transgression against divine redemption.[36] Theological leaders like Shlomo Aviner have declared an absolute Torah prohibition against the transfer of any portion of the land to foreign rule, equating discussions of territorial concessions to a profanation of the Name of God.[36] This messianic doctrine mandates that the state settle the entire Land of Israel and establish its rule over it, utilizing peaceful means if possible, and war if necessary, under historical commands not to abandon the land to any other nation.[36]

This radical theology has successfully captured key state mechanisms, exploiting the political vulnerabilities of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to mainstream discourse advocating for the complete destruction of Palestinian national identity and the forced transfer of populations.[13, 37] The radicalization of the state apparatus is further evidenced on the ground in the West Bank, where soldiers and ideological settlers execute unauthorized family evictions and land seizures with total state impunity.[38] This systemic radicalization is reflected in the official rhetoric of state leaders:

• Yoav Gallant (Former Defence Minister): Declared the military was “fighting human animals” and acting accordingly, signaling a complete removal of conventional tactical restraints.[13]
• Daniel Hagari (IDF Spokesperson): Acknowledged that military operations in Gaza were “focused on what causes maximum damage” rather than “accuracy”.[13]
• Bezalel Smotrich (Finance Minister): Publicly asserted that the Palestinian people “do not exist” and called for the complete destruction of Gaza, stating that the population would “leave in great numbers to third countries”.[13]
• Isaac Herzog (President): Legitimized mass civilian casualties by claiming that “an entire nation out there is responsible” for resisting the state, dismissing the distinction between combatants and civilians.[13]

Underlying these policies is an acute, permanent demographic anxiety.[8, 39] Within the single sovereign territory currently controlled by the Israeli government—spanning from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea—the Jewish and Palestinian populations exist in near-numerical parity.[8, 40] This parity can be represented as:

P_Jewish ≈ P_Palestinian

​To maintain Jewish demographic and political dominance in a territory populated by two equal groups, the state has institutionalized a highly complex regime of segregation, legal fragmentation, and systematic rights deprivation.[8] This demographic imperative dictates a wide array of state policies, including the rejection of the Palestinian right of return, the aggressive recruitment of Jewish immigrants regardless of their non-Jewish familial connections, and the implementation of citizenship laws designed to restrict Palestinian family unification.[39, 41] The debate over the transfer of Palestinians from their homeland is increasingly normalized as part of legitimate political discourse in Israel to preserve a demographic majority.[37, 39]

This demographic-territorial project has been systematically facilitated by the nation’s highest judicial body.[9] While the Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice, was historically celebrated in Western liberal circles for its judicial activism under figures like Aharon Barak, a microanalysis of its jurisprudence reveals deep complicity in the preservation of the occupation.[9, 41] The judiciary has effectively transitioned from a “rule of law” paradigm to a “rule by law” model, serving as a primary legal technology for land expropriation.[9] By creating novel, contorted legal concepts such as “prolonged occupation” and validating “firing zone” evictions (as seen in the Masafer Yatta case), the court has provided a legal veneer for settler takeover while gradually withdrawing from the global community of courts.[9, 41] This legal normalization cascades to the ground: soldiers operating post-October 7 act with complete impunity, unilaterally evacuating West Bank families without formal operational command, secure in the knowledge that they will not face domestic justice.[38]

---

The Fallacy of Leadership Exchange: Settler-Colonial Foundations and the Historical Continuum

A central miscalculation of mainstream international diplomacy is the belief that the removal of specific political figures, such as Benjamin Netanyahu, would fundamentally alter Israel’s strategic trajectory.[7] Geopolitical and historical analysis demonstrates that the drive for territorial expansion is not the product of a single populist administration, but is structurally embedded in the historical, settler-colonial framework of the state.[6, 42] The logic of settler-colonialism operates on an eliminationist premise: the indigenous population must be removed, contained, or erased to make way for the settler collective.[42]

This project has historically relied on “memoricide”—the systematic erasure of Palestinian history and physical presence.[43] Following the ethnic cleansing of 1948, the newly established state, now in control of 78 percent of the land, accelerated a massive toponymic project to physically and culturally overwrite disappearing Palestinian villages.[43] During the pre-state period, the Zionist Yishuv developed three key strategies to achieve this geographic erasure:

• Appropriation and Hybridization: The appropriation of Arab names, the hybridization of names of Jewish settlements, and the active indigenisation of the settlers to establish a historical connection to the land.[43]
• Biblical Instrumentalization: The instrumentalisation of biblical myth-narratives and “restorationist” biblical archaeology to Hebrewize and biblicize Palestinian Arabic toponyms.[43]
• Scientific Validation: The utilization of the toponymic lists of the Palestine Exploration Fund and the works of Western biblical archaeologists to provide scientific legitimacy to settler-colonial claims.[43]

The conquest of 1967 shifted the Zionist objective from the creation of a “normal” nation-state, accepted on equal terms by the community of nations, to a messianic message of divinely ordained “abnormality” and maximalist territorial liberation.[6] The emotional upsurge that followed the conquest of the central portions of biblical Israel, combined with the international pariah status to which Israel was relegated after the 1973 war, struck responsive chords within the national psyche.[6] This message asserted that Jews could not be a “normal” people, that the Bible had ordained a unique purpose for the Jewish people, and that its destiny could only be fulfilled via heroic efforts to liberate the entire “Land of Israel” against worldwide opposition.[6]

This historical continuum is directly reflected in the “iron wall” doctrine of Revisionist Zionism, which dismissed the idea of negotiated compromise with Palestinian nationalism.[7] Ariel Sharon’s unilateral disengagement from Gaza and parts of the West Bank was designed not as a step toward a two-state compromise, but as a calculated mechanism to manage conflict unilaterally, maximize land control, bypass Palestinian leadership, and prevent the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state.[7] Sharon calculated that the unilateral removal of small settlements would allow Israel to control the scope of withdrawal, delivering a mortal blow to Palestinian quests for statehood and making a return to the 1949 armistice lines impossible.[7]

This unilateral approach bypassed bilateral processes entirely, entrenching a single authority—the Israeli government—ruling primarily over the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, methodologically privileging Jewish Israelis while repressing Palestinians.[7, 8] Because this expansionist framework is deeply institutionalized across Israel’s political, military, and judicial systems, any change in leadership would merely result in a shift in the style of management, rather than a departure from the structural objective of maintaining permanent domination.[8]

---

Strategic Forecasts: Isolation, Internal Rot, and the South African Analogy

The convergence of military overreach, domestic radicalization, and the erosion of international legal standing has locked Israel into a highly volatile strategic trajectory.[1, 33] The unprecedented scale of physical and infrastructure devastation in Gaza has triggered historic legal challenges and accelerating global isolation.[14, 33] Rather than establishing permanent security, the state’s reliance on kinetic force has intensified its long-term vulnerabilities, leaving the home front exposed to regional escalation.[2]

Pressure Vector	Operational Reality	Geopolitical & Strategic Impact
International Legal Accountability	International Court of Justice binding orders and UN Human Rights Council findings of genocidal intent.[13, 14, 33]	Erosion of state legitimacy, potential for international sanctions, and the criminalization of state actions abroad.[23, 34]
Humanitarian Crisis Metrics	Over 72,700 direct deaths, 10,000+ estimated famine deaths, and 85% of the population displaced in Gaza.[14]	Deepening global outrage, permanent destruction of regional normalization prospects, and domestic instability in allied Western states.[5, 34]
Logistical & Military Vulnerability	Total dependence on U.S. weapon supplies, precision guidance systems, and jet spare parts.[10, 32]	Single point of failure if U.S. administrations condition military aid due to domestic political pressure.[10, 32]
Regional Resistance Dynamics	Continued military operations in Lebanon and Gaza without diplomatic off-ramps.[3, 12]	Perpetual home-front exposure to multi-directional missile attacks, rendering border communities permanently uninhabitable.[2, 12]

This structural impasse suggests that change will not originate from within a brainwashed, comfortable electorate, but will only occur when the international community forces a shift.[26, 40] This dynamic is illustrated by the historical “South African analogy”.[40] The white minority regime in South Africa did not abandon apartheid due to internal moral awakening; rather, the business community eventually approached the government and declared that continuing conventional business operations had become impossible due to international sanctions, disinvestment, and global isolation.[40]

Until the international community wakes up and imposes similar, unsustainable economic and political costs, the Israeli state will continue its current policies, secure in the belief that its actions carry minimal material consequences.[9, 40] Absent this external intervention, Israel risks entrenching itself in an endless cycle of violence—one that normalizes a permanent “country of blood” trajectory, drives the nation toward a terminal existential crisis, and ensures long-term instability across the Middle East.[1, 3, 18]

---

1. The Israel-Hamas War and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict – Cambridge Papers, https://www.cambridgepapers.org/the-israel-hamas-war-and-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict/
2. Gideon Levy Debunks the Myth of Israel’s “Military Option” Against Iran – LobeLog, https://lobelog.com/gideon-levy-debunks-the-myth-of-israels-military-option-against-iran/
3. Why Israel Wants a War with Iran (w/ Gideon Levy) | Chris Hedges Report – Apple Podcasts, https://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/why-israel-wants-a-war-with-iran-w-gideon-levy/id1760075975?i=1000757406732
4. Gaza’s Reality Has Been Hidden From the Israeli Public – DAWN, https://dawnmena.org/gazas-reality-has-been-hidden-from-the-israeli-public/
5. the israeli lobby – Columbia International Affairs Online, https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/jps/vol34-139/vol34-139_d.pdf
6. Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. – DTIC, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA175025.pdf
7. Ariel Sharon and the Jordan Option – MERIP – Middle East Research and Information Project, https://www.merip.org/2005/03/ariel-sharon-and-the-jordan-option/
8. A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution | HRW, https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution
9. no place for palestinians: the israeli high court of justice fades out of the global community – Boston University, https://www.bu.edu/ilj/files/2023/03/Ben-Naftali-Diamond-41.1.pdf
10. Israel cannot afford to defy Trump over Iran: Gideon Levy – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBUTXIAgY6s
11. Frontiers and Ghettos – UC Press E-Books Collection, https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=kt2k401947;chunk.id=0;doc.view=print
12. Top News on Israel/Palestine Archives – Foundation for Middle East Peace, https://fmep.org/blog/resourcecat/top-news-on-israel-palestine/
13. Intent and incitement in the Gaza genocide – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intent_and_incitement_in_the_Gaza_genocide
14. Gaza genocide – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide
15. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY (REQUEST F – the United Nations, https://unispal.un.org/pdfs/Annex.pdf
16. Human rights situation in the OATs/Gaza Strip withdrawal/Wall/Settlements – CHR 62nd session – Sp. Rapporteur (Dugard) report – Question of Palestine – the United Nations, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-177344/
17. Human rights situation in the OATs – CHR 58th session – Sp. Rapporteur (Dugard) report – Question of Palestine – the United Nations, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-190066/
18. When Israel’s accomplices accustom us to a monstrous, heartless and inhuman world!, https://www.cadtm.org/When-Israel-s-accomplices-accustom-us-to-a-monstrous-heartless-and-inhuman
19. “I Won’t Be Inclusive of Child Killers”: Norman Finkelstein on Israel’s “Genocidal Society”, https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/i-wont-be-inclusive-of-child-killers
20. Gideon Levy – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_Levy
21. Situation of human rights in the OPT/Aftermath of Operation Cast Lead – Sp. Rapporteur (Falk) – Report, SecGen note – Question of Palestine – the United Nations, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-189696/
22. (PDF) Israel’s Genocide in Gaza: An Annotated Bibliography – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397627882_Israel’s_Genocide_in_Gaza_An_Annotated_Bibliography
23. UN Asian and Pacific Meeting in Support of Israeli-Palestinian Peace (Bangkok, 10-11 July 2012) – Report – DPR publication – Question of Palestine – the United Nations, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-196910/
24. Otherwise Occupied: An Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Zionist Carceral Practice – Massey Research Online, https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/1dea022a-9c39-47ad-b7a4-87036ad84b17/download
25. A Multidisciplinary Journal on National Security – INSS, https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Adkan24.4Eng_5.pdf
26. Gideon Levy – Speech at the Olof Palme Prize reception ceremony 29 januari 2016 So this was hope and now comes the one who alw, http://www.palmefonden.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Speech-Gideon-Levy.pdf
27. Against the war: the movement that dare not speak its name in Israel | Gaza | The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/06/gaza-israel-movement-that-dare-not-speak-its-name
28. Israel’s Gadfly – In These Times, https://inthesetimes.com/article/israels-gadfly
29. My Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel by Ari Shavit | Goodreads, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18849575-my-promised-land
30. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy – Harvard University, https://appext.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=209
31. Israel is an apartheid state; peace in West Asia is far off: Gideon Levy – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOVyQcQz60c
32. Schlaglicht Number 6/24, Latest News from the Israeli Press, March 16-31, 2024 – Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Israel, https://israel.fes.de/e/schlaglicht-number-06-24.html
33. S/2024/419 Security Council – United Nations Digital Library System, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4052440/files/S_2024_419-EN.pdf
34. Disarm Israel | Verso Books, https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/news/disarm-israel
35. Against Exceptionalism – MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/13/2/50
36. For The Land and The Lord: Chapter 5 – School of Arts & Sciences, https://www.sas.upenn.edu/penncip/lustick/lustick15.html
37. Racism, Refugees, and Apartheid, https://badil.org/cached_uploads/view/2021/05/06/al-majdal-15-1620308690.pdf
38. ‘The two-state solution died a long time ago’: Gideon Levy on Gaza conflict – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nZfzmhMzC4
39. Demography and transfer: Israel’s road to nowhere, https://library.fes.de/libalt/journals/swetsfulltext/17189050.pdf
40. Has Gaza become ‘Israel’s playbook’ for the region? | Gideon Levy explains – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfUnnMYT6xQ
41. The Myth of Israel’s Liberal Supreme Court Exposed – MERIP, https://www.merip.org/2012/02/the-myth-of-israels-liberal-supreme-court-exposed/
42. Reproductive Genocide, Disabling Futures, and Carcerality in Gaza, https://sfonline.barnard.edu/reproductive-genocide-disabling-futures-and-carcerality-in-gaza/
43. Settler-Colonialism, Memoricide and Indigenous Toponymic Memory: The Appropriation of Palestinian Place Names by the Israeli State | Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies, https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/hlps.2015.0103