Table of Contents
- What is the naturalistic fallacy?
- But what if nature is neither good nor bad as these terms are social constructions, and claiming maladaptive human behaviour like warfare and competition are natural is the mistake than undoes the mistake of the naturalistic fallacy?
- What if we have an natural innate sensory self-regularity learning and correcting guidance system that is able to provide personalized and situation-specific contextual information that if developed naturally always result in adaptive responses, would this change anything?
- Katherine Peil Kauffman has proposed such a natural guidance system! Can you peruse her works and unpack her arguments and how her challenge of the traditional interpretation of the naturalistic fallacy deserves a reevaluation of all of our social constructs?
- Can you highlight in more detail the specifics of her arguments and how our social-constructed concepts of “good” and “evil”, “right” and “wrong”, and “sin” via systemic deception have allowed collective distortion of our complex emotions for manipulation and control by the ruling classes of the masses in a top-down fashion, rather than letting our naturally-based biologically-grounded innate-guidance and corrective systems of primary emotions lead the way and inform us individually and collectively to not only self-preserve, but self-develop and self-actualize?
- Can you provide a title for an article expressing this profound shift in implications for our moral systems?
- Can you give me a list of blog article titles summarizing what we have learnt in this chat?
- Can you create a vibrant image radiating this dawn of a new day of understandings?
- References
