Can harmful institutions be replaced without sacrificing the services that keep people alive? This Debate weighs Bichara Sahely’s transition framework against entrenched financial power, operational dependence, unequal costs and successor capture, asking whether formal safeguards can deliver lasting protection and effective public accountability. Read More
How can societies transform harmful institutions without disrupting the essential services on which people depend? This academic paper proposes a framework for protecting life-enabling functions while making those who control them accountable and replaceable. It connects civil commons, living coordination and binding transition agreements with safeguards against successor capture.
Can a carefully bounded Transformational Laboratory survive the complexity, inequality and unpredictability of actual human institutions? This critique examines the Protocol’s scalability, administrative demands, assumptions about coordination, treatment of power, resource requirements and capacity to adapt without losing its constitutional safeguards. Read More
This audiovisual companion introduces the Transformational Laboratories Protocol, the operational layer of the Civilizational Healing Project. It explores how affected communities and responsible institutions can test bounded real-world change through living coordination, legitimate authority, protective safeguards, plural evidence, non-sovereign AI, repair and recursive learning—without reproducing domination or displacing harm.
How can Civilizational Healing move from theory into bounded, governed and empirically testable praxis without treating people as experimental objects or reproducing domination? Transformational Laboratories Protocol v1.0 specifies the qualification gates, safeguards, governance and learning architecture for that transition, with living coordination as a necessary but insufficient relational substrate. Read More
How can a civilization think with artificial intelligence without being thought for by it? This capstone Transformational Study examines how AI can enlarge collective intelligence without becoming sovereign over what societies know, judge, authorize, or do. It develops a constitutional framework for the epistemic commons in which AI augments cognition while authority remains accountable, synthesis contestable, responsibility intact, repair possible, and the capacities to challenge, refuse, revise, and exit remain real.
What happens when healing cannot be consensual? This third Transformational Study develops a political ethic for Civilizational Healing where conflict persists, protective constraint becomes necessary, and injury demands repair. It asks how societies can confront domination without turning corrective power into domination itself—protecting persons, contesting claims, constraining evidenced injurious mechanisms, repairing enduring consequences, and preserving the possibility of challenge.
Why do societies continue to reproduce harmful arrangements even when their life-disabling consequences are already substantially recognized? This paper identifies a recognition–transformation gap and argues that knowledge alone is rarely sufficient for structural change. It develops a framework linking regime reproduction, transformational and countervailing capacity, power, successor viability, transition protection, authorization, implementation, durability, legitimacy, and non-domination. The framework is examined across tobacco control, the Montreal Protocol, fossil-energy transition, nineteenth-century urban sanitation, and artificial intelligence. T1 is the first formal study of the Transformational Layer of the Civilizational Healing research programme.
