This paper develops the concept of Life-Coherent Peace as an integrative framework for human and planetary flourishing. It brings together John McMurtry’s life-value onto-axiology, Humberto Maturana’s biology of autopoiesis and love, and Johan Galtung’s peace research on direct, structural, and cultural violence. The central argument is that peace should not be understood merely as the absence of war, direct injury, or disorder, but as the organized social, ecological, economic, cultural, and relational enablement of life-capacities. McMurtry provides the value criterion: the good is that which enables a more coherently inclusive range of thought, felt being, and action, while disvalue reduces, disables, or destroys these capacities. Maturana provides the biological and epistemological grounding: living beings are autonomous, structurally coupled unities who bring forth worlds in domains of languaging and emotioning, and human coexistence becomes possible in the relational domain of love understood as acceptance of the other as legitimate in coexistence. Galtung provides the diagnostic grammar: violence is not only direct harm but also the structural and cultural organization of avoidable life-disablement. Read together, these thinkers disclose peace as life-coherent coexistence: the compossible flourishing of persons, communities, species, and planetary life-support systems. The paper strengthens this synthesis by addressing two critical challenges: first, the risk of reducing love to bureaucracy or imposing life-value through domination; second, the problem of competing life-needs when different life-enabling claims come into conflict. It therefore proposes a Life-Coherence Test and a Life-Coherence Arbitration Protocol as disciplined, dialogical methods for evaluating policies, institutions, technologies, and cultural arrangements. The paper concludes that Life-Coherent Peace is not a utopian end-state or technocratic command system, but a secular covenant for life on Earth: a shared commitment to organize coexistence so that living beings can think, feel, act, relate, and flourish without destroying the life-ground of others.
Tag: Life-Ground Ethics
When We Pray, We Must All Move Our Feet: From Hurricane Survival to Regenerative Community Coherence | ChatGPT5 & NotebookLM
This essay argues that the true meaning of prayer is not passive hope or selective gratitude, but alignment with the realities that sustain life. Reflecting on the Caribbean’s experiences with Hurricanes Irma (2017) and Melissa (2025), it challenges the idea that survival is a personal blessing and instead examines the social, ecological, and infrastructural patterns that determine vulnerability and resilience. Drawing from John McMurtry’s Life-Ground ethical framework and Jacque Fresco’s resource-based architectural and social design principles, the essay presents resilience not as the ability to rebuild what has been destroyed, but as the capacity to redesign society in coherence with ecological processes and community interdependence. It proposes a shift from reactive disaster recovery to proactive, regenerative community systems rooted in relational belonging, ecological restoration, and resilient design. Prayer in this context becomes a commitment to move our feet — to act together to protect the conditions of life itself.
Life-Value Onto-Axiology and Life-Ground Ethics | Prof John McMurtry
Table of Contents
- Life-Value Onto-Axiology and Life-Ground Ethics
- The Primary Axiom of Value
- Choice Space
- Moral Obligation
- The Unlimited Validity of the Primary Axiom
- Freedom of the Individual by Collective Life Support
- THE UNIVERSAL HUMAN LIFE NECESSITIES and LAWS OF THEIR PROVISION
- Life-Ground Ethics: From Theory to Practise
- The Problem of an A-Priori Life-Blind Value Calculus
- The Game Theory Paradigm of the Ruling Value System
- The Ultimate Moral Choice Space: Life or Death for the Planet
- The Dynamic Metaphysics of Life-Value Onto-Axiology










