Tag: One Health

Book cover: The Social Ecology of Immune Disease with subtitle and author at bottom, featuring a circular abstract diagram and globe imagery in soft blue and green tones.

The Social Ecology of Immune Disease | ChatGPT-5.5 Thinking and NotebookLM

Modern immunology has achieved extraordinary explanatory and therapeutic power through the study of antigen specificity, clonal selection, adaptive immune memory, tolerance, vaccination, immunodeficiency, inflammation, autoimmunity, cancer immunotherapy, and targeted immune modulation. Yet the growing burden of immune-mediated, allergic, autoinflammatory, cardiometabolic, fibrotic, infectious, and inflammation-related chronic diseases suggests that these mechanisms must now be situated within a wider population-health and ecological frame.

This white paper proposes the social ecology of immune disease as an integrative framework for understanding immune pathology not simply as “too much” or “too little” immunity, but as a loss of immune coherence: a breakdown in proportion, context, timing, memory discipline, resolution, and repair. A healthy immune system must sense danger without hallucinating danger; respond without destroying the tissue it protects; tolerate what is life-compatible; remember what is worth remembering; and resolve and repair without scarring the future.

This framework does not reject mainstream immunology. It explicitly preserves the reality and importance of protective immunity, adaptive immune memory, vaccination, antigen specificity, tolerance mechanisms, antimicrobials, biologics, immunosuppression, immunotherapy, surgery, emergency care, and disease-specific pathways. Rather, it embeds these within a wider biology of danger, tissue context, trained inflammatory history, active resolution, repair, and the social and planetary conditions that shape immune life.

At the population level, immune disease reflects the patterned distribution of upstream conditions that generate danger, damage barriers, distort microbial ecology, train inflammatory memory, impair tolerance, exhaust defense, and prevent resolution. These conditions include maternal-child health, nutrition, infection burden, vaccination access, antibiotic use, air pollution, toxic exposures, housing, work, psychosocial stress, sleep, metabolic disease, oral health, biodiversity loss, climate disruption, antimicrobial resistance, and access to timely care.

The paper argues for a wu-wei approach to prevention and healing: not therapeutic passivity, but minimum-sufficient, context-sensitive, condition-restoring action. The goal is neither to stimulate immunity in general nor to suppress inflammation indiscriminately, but to create the biological, social, and planetary conditions under which immune systems can remain proportionate, protective, tolerant, memory-capable, resolutive, and regenerative.

Read More

Book cover for 'Natural Drift and the Future of Medicine' showing the Earth, a central tree, and people blending rural and urban health scenes with doctors and researchers around the globe centerpiece.

Natural Drift and the Future of Medicine | ChatGPT-5.5 Thinking and NotebookLM

Modern medicine is reaching the limits of a disease-centered paradigm when confronted by chronic disease, antimicrobial resistance, zoonotic risk, metabolic illness, mental distress, ecological degradation, climate vulnerability, social fragmentation, and widening inequity. These crises cannot be adequately understood as isolated biological malfunctions, nor as external “determinants” added around the individual body. They arise from historically conserved ways of living that have reshaped the relations among human beings, animals, plants, microbes, ecosystems, institutions, technologies, economies, and planetary systems.

This white paper develops a Maturana-informed account of natural drift as a conceptual foundation for rethinking medicine within the biosphere–anthroposphere unity. Rather than viewing evolution as adaptation to a pre-given environment, Maturana’s concept of natural drift emphasizes the historical conservation and transformation of organism–niche relations. Extended to human civilization, this insight suggests that societies drift according to the conversations, emotions, institutions, technologies, practices, and desires they conserve.

The paper argues that medicine must now be situated within this larger drift. Human civilization has become a planetary niche-making force, and its conserved patterns increasingly shape the health of persons, communities, animals, plants, microbes, ecosystems, and future generations. One Health provides the operational framework for recognizing the interdependence of human, animal, plant, microbial, ecosystem, and institutional health. The Field of Viability Framework provides the diagnostic grammar for assessing how constraints, margins, state, disturbance, perception, regulation, and options preserve or erode life-capacity.

The paper proposes that the future of medicine lies in becoming a reflective and practical discipline of life-coherent drift: rescuing the acutely ill, restoring organism–niche coherence, preventing the production of avoidable suffering, coordinating One Health action, and helping civilization consciously conserve the conditions in which life can continue to bring forth life. This does not displace acute biomedical care or make clinicians responsible for civilization as a whole; rather, it situates rescue, chronic care, public health, One Health, and policy guidance within a shared responsibility for conserving life-capacity.

Read More

Circulatory Health as a Coherence System: Integrating Developmental, Social, Economic, and Planetary Determinants Across Scales | ChatGPT5.3, Gemini and NotebookLM

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide despite major advances in clinical care. This persistent burden reflects a structural limitation: prevailing models are predominantly oriented toward downstream intervention rather than upstream condition design.

We propose a unifying framework in which circulatory health is understood as the stability of a multi-scale system shaped across the life course. Integrating insights from developmental biology, social and commercial determinants of health, and policy frameworks, we describe health as the dynamic balance between system load, capacity, and adaptive response.

This framework is aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO strategies, and extends these through a reframing of economic activity (SDG 8) and a One Health perspective linking human, societal, and planetary systems. We introduce a crosswalk that maps system dynamics to policy levers, enabling translation across domains.

This approach shifts the focus of cardiovascular health from reactive disease management to proactive condition design, with implications for clinical practice, public health, and governance. Health emerges not from intervention alone, but from the coherence of circulation across interconnected systems.

Read More

A Life-Value Onto-Axiological “Big Picture” Framework for One Health | ChatGPT o1/4o

Table of Contents

  • Can you analyze and unpack please this slide showing the relational epidemiology between chronic disease and climate change?
  • Are there analogous psychosocial and economic pathology pathways that can be similarly aligned, and what is the underlying meta-pattern?
  • Can you unpack the more holistic systems approach?
  • Can you envision a salutogenic holistic integral nondual model of One Health and what new insights would it provide that would be helpful?
  • Can this framing be better envisioned through John McMurtry’s life-value onto-axiological lens?
  • By using McMurtry’s life-value onto-axiology framework, how does this clarify and help us understand better Egger’s “Big Picture” Prevention model?
  • How does McMurtry’s life-value onto-axiological framework help us also to better address and prevent the psychosocial and economic pathologies discussed earlier?
  • Can you now summarize as concisely and precisely as possible the mistakes made and the lessons learnt that have been discovered in this discussion?
  • Taking an all-of-society and all-of-government approach with life-value in all policies, can you design the policy framework that acknowledges the mistakes made and lessons learnt, in guiding the relevant stakeholders, going forward?
  • Can you create a title for an article that incorporates all of these insights?
  • Can you create headings and subheadings for such an article?
  • Can you now create the article with references that is suitable for academic journal publications?
  • Can you create a vibrant image of this life-value society?
  • Can you create a compelling life-awakening narrative explication of the themes of the academic article you have created?

Read More

A SMART approach to One Love and One Health: A ChatGPT4o explication of an emerging, integrative perspective that transcends and includes the processes of energy conservation and stress mitigation grounded in safe, stable, and nurturing relationships and life-value onto-axiological principles

Goal: Reduce chronic stress and improve overall health in a selected community by integrating One Health and One Love principles over the next 3 years.

  • Specific: Implement community-based health programs that address human, animal, and environmental health, and promote social cohesion through inclusive activities.
  • Measurable: Track the reduction in chronic stress indicators (e.g., cortisol levels, self-reported stress), improvements in health outcomes (e.g., reduced incidence of stress-related illnesses), and community engagement levels.
  • Achievable: Secure funding, partner with local health and social organizations, and utilize existing community resources.
  • Relevant: Addresses interconnected health issues and promotes a supportive community environment, aligning with the BEC, CDR, and life-value compass principles.
  • Time-bound: Roll out the program within 6 months, with ongoing monitoring and a comprehensive review after 3 years.

By setting SMART goals, these insights can be translated into concrete actions that foster safe, secure, and nurturing relationships, ultimately leading to societal transformation.

Read More

Towards Learning the Life Capital Solution (An Essay as part of the Festshrift for Prof John McMurtry) | Bichara Sahely (2024)

This essay honors and extends John McMurtry’s life-value onto-axiology by arguing that contemporary health, social, and ecological crises share a common root: a life-blind social value system organized around private money sequencing rather than the sequencing of life. Drawing on the author’s medical practice and multi-year correspondence with McMurtry, the paper introduces life-capital — the wealth of means of life that reproducibly generates more means of life through time — as the missing integrator across clinical medicine, public policy, and planetary stewardship. It sets out McMurtry’s Primary Axiom of Value (value = that which enables a more coherently inclusive range of thought/feeling/action) and the Universal Human Life Necessities as testable, operational criteria for designing institutions, laws, and programs that measurably enable life rather than degrade it. The essay calls for open access to life-relevant knowledge, a shift from extraction to life-value addition, and practical rationing to life necessities (not scarcity), and it closes with action-questions spanning AI, public health, reconciliation, and institutional learning. An Appendix sketches how the life-capital lens unifies “One Health” across people, animals, ecosystems, and knowledge systems.

Read More