[Download Full Document (PDF)]
This white paper explores the convergence of two potent frameworks: cliodynamics, which reveals the structural patterns underlying societal rise and collapse, and regenerative coherence, which emphasizes symbolic alignment across nested systems as the key to lasting integration. Drawing on Peter Turchin’s analytic work and the empirical findings of the Seshat project, we uncover a consistent trajectory of sociopolitical complexity marked by population growth, hierarchy, bureaucratic elaboration, and information systems. Yet alongside these material dynamics, we argue for a deeper axis — symbolic coherence — which governs the capacity of societies to coordinate meaning, align values, and integrate across time and scale.
We challenge the dominant “Big Gods” hypothesis and reframe the so-called Axial Age not as a singular moral breakthrough, but as a series of regionally specific coherence bifurcations. These shifts were as often regressive or fragmentary as they were integrative. The real historical challenge was not the emergence of morality per se, but the successful encoding of symbolic grammars capable of sustaining complexity without collapse.
Using the TATi developmental grammar (Tend, Align, Transcend, Integrate), we map the internal logic of societal transformation and identify the thresholds where either coherence or disintegration unfolds. We highlight the importance of symbolic infrastructure — ritual, law, cosmology, and myth — as the scaffolding of civilizational stability.
Implications are drawn for:
- New metrics of nested coherence to guide regenerative policy.
- Participatory forecasting tools that integrate narrative and analytics.
- Institutional redesign based on symbolic subsidiarity and life-value realization.
- Educational transformation toward mythopoetic fluency.
The synthesis concludes by reframing civilizational evolution not as a linear march of progress or complexity, but as a recursive spiral of symbolic re-integration, where the health of a society depends on how it coheres — not only structurally, but semantically, ethically, and cosmologically.
