Defeasible Reasoning: The forms of reasoning that are not as formal and rigorous as deductive reasoning. The term was brought to prominence by Pollock (1995), reasoning is defeasible when the corresponding argument, though not valid, is yet rationally meritorious. Pollock developed the term to help work through issues in epistemology. Given the relationship between epistemology and logic, it is not surprising that the term has found employment in logic. In recent work, the term has typically been limited to inferences involving rough-and-ready, exception-permitting generalizations, that is, inferring what has or will happen on the basis of what normally happens (Stanford Online Encyclopedia).
New to the Commons?
Begin gently with Start Here, or use Recommended Pathways to find the route that fits your concern.
Practical Tools
Use the Tools for Life-Coherent Repair page to apply the framework to real situations.
Project Hubs
Enter major works through curated rooms for civilization, health, economy, peace, wisdom, and Caribbean / SIDS applications.