Tag: Charles Eisenstein

Book cover for Bringing Forth the More Beautiful World by Bichara Sahely, featuring a circular diagram with a central plant and layered rings of figures and nature motifs; subtitle lists coherent language, peace, interbeing, and life-coherent civilization.

Bringing Forth the More Beautiful World: A Grammar of Coherent Languaging, Gift, Nest, Peace, Interbeing, and Life-Coherent Civilization | ChatGPT 5.5 Thinking and NotebookLM

This book asks what was missing from a formal architecture of viability. Its answer is the felt, relational, developmental, pedagogical, civic, ecological, and intergenerational grammar through which human beings actually bring forth worlds. Drawing on Maturana’s biology of cognition, Deacon’s account of absence and constraint, Bateson’s “difference that makes a difference,” McMurtry’s life-value onto-axiology, Vaughan’s gift theory of language and economy, Narvaez’s Evolved Nest and Triune Ethics Theory, Galtung’s peace research, and Eisenstein’s story of interbeing, the book develops a practical grammar of coherent languaging for life-coherent civilizational design.

The central claim is that worlds are not merely predicted or planned; they are brought forth through the distinctions we make, the words we give, the gifts we protect, the children we nest, the commons we repair, the conflicts we transform, and the futures we refuse to betray. The book translates “absence” into the warmer language of call, need, towardness, mattering, repair, and becoming; reframes value as answered life; restores language as gift; redefines economy as life-provisioning; presents the Evolved Nest as civilizational infrastructure; interprets peace as answered need; and places interbeing as the mythic-affective bridge beyond the story of separation.

The practical grammar proposed is: Hear → Name → Ground → Gift → Provision → Repair → Transmit. This grammar is applied across family life, education, clinical care, community dialogue, governance, ecological repair, public policy, and future trusteeship. The book concludes that a more beautiful world is not elsewhere. It appears wherever life is heard and answered without domination.

Read More

Gift Economy – Discussion | wiki.p2pfoundation.net

“Exchange creates and requires scarcity. If everyone were giving to everyone else, there would be no need to exchange. The market needs scarcity to maintain the level of prices. In fact when there is an abundance of products scarcity is often created on purpose. An example of this is the plowing under of ‘overabundant’ crops (which may happen even when people are standing by who are hungry). On a larger scale scarcity is created 1. by the channeling of wealth into the hands of the few who then have power over the many; 2. by spending on armaments and monuments which have no nurturing value but only serve for destruction and display of power; and 3. by privatizing or depleting the environment so that the gifts of nature are unavailable to the many. The exchange paradigm is a belief system which validates this kind of behavior. Individuals who espouse it are functional to the economic system of which they are a part. Exchange is adversarial, each person tries to give less and get more, an attitude which creates antagonism and distance among the players. Gift giving creates and requires abundance. In fact, in scarcity gift giving is difficult and even self sacrificial while in abundance it is satisfying and even delightful.”

Read More

Living in the Gift | Charles Eisenstein

Why does the sun shine? A random result of coalescing gases igniting nuclear fusion? Or is it in order to give its light and warmth to Life? Why does the rain fall? Is it the senseless product of blind chemical processes of evaporation and condensation? Or is it to water life? Why do you seek to pour forth your song? Is it to show off your genetic fitness to attract a mate, or is it to contribute to a more beautiful world? We may fear those first answers but it is the second that carries the ring of truth. Read More

Initiation into a Living Planet | Charles Eisenstein

Perversely, the dominant global warming narrative facilitates denialism by shifting alarm onto a defeasible scientific theory whose ultimate proof can only come when it is too late. With effects that are distant in space and time, and causally distant as well, it is much easier to deny climate change than it is to deny, say, that whale hunting kills whales, that deforestation dries up the land, that plastic is killing marine life, and so forth. By the same token, the effects of place-based ecological healing are easier to see than the climate effects of photovoltaic panels or wind turbines. The causal distance is shorter, and the effects more tangible. For example, where farmers practice soil regeneration, the water table begins to rise, springs that were dry for decades come back to life, streams begin flowing year round again, and songbirds and wildlife return to the area. This is visible without needing to trust distant scientific institutions. Read More

“Our New, Happy Life? The Ideology of Development” by Charles Eisenstein

Reproduced from: https://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/our-new-happy-life-by-charles-eisentstein Our New, Happy Life? The Ideology of Development by Charles Eisenstein May 7, 2018 In George Orwell’s 1984, there is a moment when the Party announces an “increase” in the chocolate ration – from thirty grams to twenty. No one except for the protagonist, Winston, seems to notice that the ration has gone… Read More

‘Money and the turning of the Age’ by Charles Eisenstein

Reposted from: https://philosophersforchange.org/2012/10/30/money-and-the-turning-of-the-age/ by Charles Eisenstein at Philosophers for Change, philoforchange.wordpress.com. Money and the turning of the Age by Charles Eisenstein As the economic meltdown proceeds to its next phase, we begin to see the unreality of much that we thought real. The verities of two generations become uncertain, and despite a lingering hope that a return to normalcy… Read More