From Structural Violence to Life-Value Coherence: A Normative Framework for Civilizational Viability | ChatGPT5.2 & NotebookLM

[Download Full Document (PDF)]

Diagnosing the Structural Violence of Endless Growth | Deep Dive Audio Overview

Structural Violence to Life-Value | Video Explainer

From Pathogenesis to Viability | Infographic (Please click on image to enlarge)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Problem

Contemporary institutions prioritize monetary growth and strategic dominance as primary indicators of success. Yet ecological instability, structural inequality, and systemic public health vulnerabilities intensify. This divergence signals structural incoherence rather than isolated policy failure.

Core Claim

Violence is best understood as the avoidable reduction of life-capacity produced by institutional design. When rationality is equated with monetary self-maximization, institutions systematically degrade the life-support systems upon which civilization depends.

Structural Architecture

The paper demonstrates:

  1. Governing value codes shape institutional design and life-capacity outcomes.
  2. Structural violence reproduces itself through feedback insulation.
  3. Militarized security often masks internal life-ground erosion.
  4. Unregulated growth detached from ecological and social constraints mirrors pathological proliferation.
  5. Crisis functions as a bifurcation threshold between retrenchment and revaluation.

Proposed Reversal

A life-value framework redefines rationality as life-capacity enablement. Institutions are evaluated by whether they expand cognitive, biological, and social capacity across generations.

The Life-Capacity Institutional Audit Framework operationalizes this shift through measurable dimensions:

  • Expansion of life-capacity
  • Protection of universal life necessities
  • Alignment of growth incentives with ecological constraint

Implications

Durable peace requires structural coherence between institutional design and life-ground viability. Growth must be reintegrated within ecological and social constraints rather than detached from them.

The choice facing modern civilization is not growth versus stagnation, but self-referential accumulation versus life-coherent viability.

Structural Frameworks for Civilizational Viability and Life-Value - Table 1.csv

Structural Frameworks for Civilizational Viability and Life-Value - Table 1.csv
Conceptual ModelGoverning Value CodeInstitutional Design FeaturesPrimary Rationality MetricEcological and Social OutcomesSecurity ParadigmGrowth Type
Accumulation-Centered SystemRationality = Monetary Self-MaximizationFinancialization, Extractive Growth, Militarized SecurityExpansion of monetary throughput / Magnitude of monetary multiplicationStructural Violence, Ecological Degradation, Inequality, Systemic Public Health InstabilityStrategic DominanceSelf-Referential
Life-Value SystemRationality = Life-Capacity EnablementCivil Commons Reinforcement, Ecological Constraint Integration, Cooperative SecurityExpansion of life-capacity across persons and generationsStructural Peace, Regenerative Stability, Expanded Life-CapacityLife-Ground ResilienceRe-Regulated

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.