Large Language Models as Symbolic DNA of Cultural Dynamics | by Parham Pourdavood and Michael Jacob and Terrence Deacon | ChatGPT5 & NotebookLM

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel conceptualization of Large Language Models (LLMs) as externalized informational substrates that function analogously to DNA for human cultural dynamics. Rather than viewing LLMs as either autonomous intelligence or mere programmed mimicry, we argue they serve a broader role as repositories that preserve compressed patterns of human symbolic expression — “fossils” of meaningful dynamics that retain relational residues without their original living contexts. Crucially, these compressed patterns only become meaningful through human reinterpretation, creating a recursive feedback loop where they can be recombined and cycle back to ultimately catalyze human creative processes. Through analysis of four universal features — compression, decompression, externalization, and recursion — we demonstrate that just as DNA emerged as a compressed and externalized medium for preserving useful cellular dynamics without containing explicit reference to goal-directed physical processes, LLMs preserve useful regularities of human culture without containing understanding of embodied human experience. Therefore, we argue that LLMs’ significance lies not in rivaling human intelligence, but in providing humanity a tool for self-reflection and playful hypothesis-generation in a low-stakes, simulated environment. This framework positions LLMs as tools for cultural evolvability, enabling humanity to generate novel hypotheses about itself while maintaining the human interpretation necessary to ground these hypotheses in ongoing human aesthetics and norms.

Read More

The Adamantine Pattern: Triality, Coherence, and the Future of Civilization | ChatGPT5 & NotebookLM

This white paper explores the hidden coherence grammar underlying life, mind, and civilization. From molecules to societies, systems endure only when three conditions are met: survival necessities, developmental capacities, and cultural coherence. This triadic structure — triality — emerges as a universal law, governing stability across scales.

We show how this adamantine pattern explains both flourishing and collapse. When triality is sustained, systems regenerate; when broken, incoherence leads inevitably to decline. Drawing on insights from mathematics, biology, philosophy, and systems theory, we integrate Ken Wilber’s Integral framework, Bernardo Kastrup’s Analytic Idealism, and John McMurtry’s Life-Value Onto-Axiology into a unified model.

The paper then applies this coherence grammar to the existential questions posed by Daniel Schmachtenberger and the Consilience Project. By translating each challenge into necessities, capacities, and coherence, we demonstrate that humanity’s crises are solvable when reframed as coherence problems.

The conclusion is both diagnostic and prescriptive: incoherence cannot recurse, but coherence can. Civilization now faces a structural choice — collapse into fragmentation, or regeneration into a life-aligned future.

Read More