This white paper synthesizes Johan Galtung’s concept of cultural violence and his archetypal diagnosis of U.S. foreign policy pathologies with John McMurtry’s analysis of the war-state paradigm. It applies this integrated framework to four contemporary cases — Gaza and the ICJ genocide proceedings, the Red Sea crisis, NATO expansion in the Ukraine war, and U.S.–China technology geopolitics (CHIPS/AI).
Findings demonstrate that the patterns identified by Galtung and McMurtry are repeating: myths of chosenness, Manichean binaries, and projection mechanisms legitimize escalation; the war-state’s closed circuit of necessity drives opposition into annihilation; structural lock-ins of the arms economy and alliances perpetuate militarization; and cultural rituals and necessity narratives obscure alternatives.
The risks are multi-dimensional: erosion of humanitarian law, escalation spirals, arms-driven inflation, democratic erosion, and cultural normalization of annihilation. Yet history shows that cultural codes can shift, arms races can be interrupted, and civil commons can be rebuilt.
We conclude with a layered package of therapies: delegitimizing cultural violence through education and symbolic reform; breaking the war-state’s lock-ins with diplomacy-first triggers, legal guardrails, and budget rebalancing; and reconstructing the civil commons as the basis of life-serving security.
