[Download Full Document (PDF)]
This document critiques major international institutions through the lens of Life-Value Onto-Axiology (LVOA), proposing a transformative approach to global governance.
Overview of Critique
The white paper evaluates the United Nations (UN), International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, World Trade Organization (WTO), and World Health Organization (WHO), identifying systemic life-incoherence. It highlights five meta-patterns of dysfunction: money-value supremacy, elite governance, siloization, epistemic reductionism, and crisis management without transformation. The critique asserts that these institutions prioritize abstract metrics over the concrete needs of life, leading to the erosion of life-support systems under the guise of progress.
Key Findings
- United Nations (UN): Although the UN’s mission is life-affirming, it is compromised by the veto powers of the Security Council and fragmented agency actions that fail to address systemic threats to life coherence.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF): The IMF enforces a debt-based financial architecture that prioritizes fiscal discipline over basic life needs, undermining health, education, and food systems in debtor nations.
- World Bank: The World Bank funds projects that often displace communities and degrade ecosystems, promoting capital-intensive infrastructure rather than regenerative economies.
- World Trade Organization (WTO): The WTO prioritizes corporate interests over public health and ecological boundaries, enforcing intellectual property rights that impede access to essential resources.
- World Health Organization (WHO): The WHO faces constraints from private donor influences and a focus on pharmaceutical interventions, marginalizing holistic health approaches.
Life-Value Onto-Axiology Framework
The LVOA framework defines value as what enables the universalizable development of life capacities without depriving others. This framework serves as both a diagnostic tool for assessing institutional coherence and a prescriptive guide for realignment toward life coherence. The Primary Axiom of Value is central to this approach, emphasizing that true value supports life without harm to others.
Institutional Failures
The document identifies that the institutions operate under a Ruling Group Mind (RGM), where elite interests overshadow collective life value. This results in policies that are often life-incoherent, leading to systemic dysfunction across various domains.
Proposals for Transformation
The white paper advocates for a radical reorientation of global governance grounded in life-value coherence. Proposed changes include:
- Adoption of Life-Grounded Metrics: Metrics should track real capacities for life across ecological, physiological, social, and existential domains.
- Democratization of Governance: Decision-making should be decentralized to restore community sovereignty.
- Redirection of Funding: Institutional funding should prioritize regenerative infrastructure that supports the biosphere rather than oligarchic interests.
- Creation of a Regenerative Global Commons Council: This council would integrate diverse knowledge systems and ensure that all policy decisions serve life first.
Conclusion
The document emphasizes the urgent need for a civilizational re-grounding in governance, shifting from coercive control to collaborative care. It calls upon all stakeholders to embrace a new paradigm of governance that enables the flourishing of life rather than merely protecting it. The transformation is portrayed not only as necessary but also as feasible, with a clear path forward through the adoption of life-value principles.
