From Resistance to Remembrance: The Hinductive Coherence Principle and the Reunification of Energy, Life, and Meaning | ChatGPT5 & NotebookLM

The evolution of biophysical understanding has passed through three paradigms: the Energy Resistance Principle (ERP), the Energy Coherence Principle (ECP), and now the Hinductive Coherence Principle (HCP). Each marks a deepening realization of how life sustains itself against entropy through self-tuning, memory-bearing geometries of flow.

Building on Picard and Murugan’s ERP, which modeled biological health as energy flow constrained by resistance, and extending through the ECP, which reframed vitality as resonance between structure and flux, the HCP introduces hinductance (H) — the fourth circuit element discovered by Anirban Bandyopadhyay. This element produces magnetic vortex flux proportional to the rate of change of stored charge, embedding geometric memory and adaptive learning into the dynamics of energy transformation.

The inclusion of hinductance completes the universal impedance equation:

Z_eff= R + j(ωL – 1/ωC + ω²H)

Here, resistance (R), inductance (L), capacitance (C), and hinductance (H) co-define a system’s total impedance (Z) and phase relationship (θ), with coherence efficiency (η = cos θ) serving as a unifying measure of health, adaptability, and integrity across scales — from mitochondria to societies.

This paper proposes that the HCP offers a universal framework for understanding how energy becomes information and how information becomes meaning. It bridges physics, biology, psychology, and governance through a shared language of impedance, resonance, and feedback memory. By extending hinductive dynamics into socio-ecological and ethical systems, the model redefines sustainability as phase alignment between metabolism, mind, and morality.

Ultimately, the HCP points to a regenerative science of coherence in which resistance is not merely overcome but remembered and transmuted — revealing life, consciousness, and civilization as nested expressions of one cosmic act of self-resonant learning.

The Energy Resistance Principle: How Life Balances Power, Flow, and Meaning | ChatGPT5 & NotebookLM

Every system that endures — cellular, social, or planetary — must balance the energy it generates with the capacity it has to channel that energy without collapse. Neuroscientist Martin Picard’s Energy Resistance Principle (ERP) describes this balance in biophysical terms: the ratio between energy potential (EP) and flux capacity (f) defines a system’s resistance (ēR = EP / f²). Low ēR corresponds to health and coherence; high ēR to stress and fragmentation.

This white paper expands ERP from its biological origins into an integrative framework for understanding individual and collective life. It shows how four major paradigms — Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics, John Fullerton’s Regenerative Paradigm, John McMurtry’s Life-Value Onto-Axiology, and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) — each describe aspects of the same energetic grammar. When interpreted through ERP, they reveal a unified law of coherence: systems thrive when potential and capacity evolve together across all scales.

By reframing economics, ethics, and governance as expressions of energy flow under constraint, the Energy Resistance Principle offers a practical compass for regeneration — from personal health and institutional design to fiscal and planetary policy. It suggests that the path to sustainability is not acceleration but attunement — the continual tuning of power and form until resistance becomes resonance.

The Life–Energy–Coherence Paradigm: Toward a Unified Science of Regenerative Health and Development | ChatGPT4o

The Life–Energy–Coherence Paradigm (LECP) presents a transformative framework for understanding health and human development, emphasizing coherence across biological, psychological, cultural, and ecological systems. This paradigm shifts the definition of health from merely the absence of disease to the dynamic realization of coherence, where energy and meaning are central to vitality and adaptation. At the core of LECP, mitochondria are identified as key decision-makers, responding to various signals from the environment and influencing healing and regeneration processes.

Core Premises and Insights

LECP posits that health emerges from the dynamic coherence of energy and meaning across multiple systems. This coherence is essential for vitality and adaptation, and disruptions in this coherence can lead to disease. Healing is redefined as the restoration of coherence, while regeneration refers to the emergence of new patterns that enhance life capacity. The paradigm integrates insights from various fields, including psychobiology, microbiome science, and ecological theory, to provide a holistic view of health.

Key Insights of LECP

Coherence is Health: Health is characterized by the integration of energy and meaning, rather than a static state.
Mitochondria as Decision Makers: Mitochondria play a critical role in sensing environmental signals and regulating growth and healing.
Microbiomes as Connectors: The gut and soil microbiomes are essential for maintaining mitochondrial function and overall health.
Sense of Coherence (SOC): A high SOC enables individuals to navigate stress effectively, promoting healing and resilience.

Implications for Health Practices

LECP advocates for a shift in health practices from merely managing symptoms to restoring coherence. This involves focusing on enhancing life capacities, integrating emotional coherence into education, and rebuilding civil commons that support health and wellbeing. In education, curricula should emphasize emotional coherence and connection to nature, while policies should prioritize access to essential life resources.

Transformative Approaches

Health Practice: Transition from symptom control to coherence restoration.
Education: Center on emotional coherence and nature.
Policy: Rebuild civil commons for equitable access to resources.

Theoretical Foundations

LECP is grounded in several theoretical frameworks, including Life-Value Onto-Axiology (LVOA), which assesses systems based on their ability to enhance life capacities. Integral Theory (AQAL) maps human experiences across dimensions, while the Salutogenic model focuses on what promotes health amidst stress. These frameworks collectively inform the understanding of coherence as a multi-dimensional phenomenon that requires integration across individual, collective, and ecological levels.

Mitochondrial Health and Healing

Mitochondria are central to the LECP, serving as bioenergetic regulators that influence cellular responses to stress and healing processes. The Energy Resistance Principle (ERP) posits that optimal energy resistance is crucial for maintaining health, while disruptions can lead to chronic illness. Healing involves a cyclical process where cells transition through phases of defense, rebuilding, and reintegration.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

The LECP emphasizes the need for a paradigm shift in how health is understood and practiced. It calls for a reweaving of the fabric of life, where coherence is prioritized across all systems. By recognizing the interconnectedness of health, ecology, and society, the LECP fosters a regenerative approach that aligns individual and collective wellbeing with the rhythms of life. This holistic perspective invites practitioners, educators, and policymakers to engage in practices that support the emergence of a more coherent and regenerative civilization.

Why Do We Care More About Disease than Health? | Martin Picard (2022)

Abstract

Modern Western biomedical research and clinical practice are primarily focused on disease. This disease-centric approach has yielded an impressive amount of knowledge around what goes wrong in illness. However, in comparison, researchers and physicians know little about health. What is health? How do we quantify it? And how do we improve it? We currently do not have good answers to these questions. Our lack of fundamental knowledge about health is partly driven by three main factors: (i) a lack of understanding of the dynamic processes that cause variations in health/disease states over time, (ii) an excessive focus on genes, and (iii) a pervasive psychological bias towards additive solutions. Here I briefly discuss potential reasons why scientists and funders have generally adopted a gene- and disease-centric framework, how medicine has ended up practicing “diseasecare” rather than healthcare, and present cursory evidence that points towards an alternative energetic view of health. Understanding the basis of human health with a similar degree of precision that has been deployed towards mapping disease processes could bring us to a point where we can actively support and promote human health across the lifespan, before disease shows up on a scan or in bloodwork.

Keywords Health · Medical care · Genomics · Personalized medicine · Energetics · Preventative medicine