Ethics as a Science of Viability: Life-Value Onto-Axiology and the Conditions of Human Flourishing | ChatGPT5.2 & NotebookLM

Contemporary societies face a persistent paradox: despite widespread commitment to values such as health, prosperity, freedom, and sustainability, social, ecological, and human crises continue to deepen. This white paper argues that the problem lies not in the absence of values, but in the absence of a shared, life-grounded standard for what value is.

Drawing on Life-Value Onto-Axiology, developed by John McMurtry, the paper reframes ethics as a science of viability — the systematic inquiry into what allows living systems to continue, adapt, and flourish without self-destruction. At its core is the Primary Axiom of Value, which defines value as the expansion of the coherent range of thought, feeling, and action, and disvalue as their reduction or destruction.

The paper unfolds this axiom step by step into universal human life necessities, life-coherent principles of social and economic organization, measures of sufficiency and progress rooted in civil commons development, the concept of life capital, and life-value efficiency criteria that prevent short-term gains from eroding long-term capacity. Ethics, economics, public health, and ecology are shown to share a single underlying logic: life must be organized so that its enabling conditions are preserved and enhanced over time.

Written for a general but serious audience, this white paper provides a coherent framework for evaluating policies, institutions, and economic systems without reliance on ideology, preference, or abstract metrics. It offers a durable orientation for distinguishing genuine progress from destructive success by using life itself as the measure of value.

Read More

Wu Wei as a Scientific Principle of Coherence: From Daoist Philosophy to Modern Decision Science and Regenerative Governance | ChatGPT5.1 & NotebookLM

Abstract

Background: Wu wei, a foundational concept in Daoist philosophy commonly translated as “effortless action,” has historically been interpreted as spiritual or ethical guidance. Recent advances in neuroscience, psychology, and systems science now allow this concept to be reframed within a rigorous scientific framework of self-regulation, stress physiology, and adaptive decision-making.

Methods: This conceptual analysis integrates findings from affective neuroscience, predictive processing, autonomic regulation, and systems theory with classical Daoist philosophy. Wu wei is examined as a biologically grounded operating mode of the human nervous system and as a design principle for social and economic systems.

Results: Wu wei is shown to correspond to a low-conflict, low–free-energy regulatory state characterized by adequate energetic capacity, autonomic stability, emotional calibration, and coherent integration of cognition and behavior. Chronic stress, economic precarity, and performance-driven institutional structures are identified as primary disruptors of this state at both individual and population levels.

Conclusion: Wu wei can be operationalized as a measurable mode of intrinsic coherence relevant to clinical practice, organizational design, and public policy. Reframing wu wei as a scientifically grounded principle of self-regulation and collective governance offers a unifying framework for health promotion, sustainable development, and regenerative socio-economic reform.

Read More

Performance as a Civilizational Liability: Semantic Warfare, GDP, and the Structural Contradiction of SDG 8 | ChatGPT5.1 & NotbookLM

Modern civilization governs itself through a performance grammar that equates output, productivity, and economic growth with progress. This white paper demonstrates that this semantic architecture, when applied to living systems, is biologically incoherent and structurally dangerous. Drawing on regulatory biology, stress physiology, life-course health, ecological resilience, and development economics, the paper shows that performance is a transient expression of stored capacity, not a measure of system health. When performance is elevated to the master variable of governance — as occurs through GDP-centered policy and Sustainable Development Goal 8 — societies reproduce at planetary scale the same pathological dynamics that generate chronic disease, burnout, and organ failure in individual bodies: chronic stress without sufficient recovery. The paper critiques GDP as a throughput metric incapable of registering biological and ecological depletion, analyzes the internal contradiction embedded within SDG 8, and proposes a post-performance metric grammar grounded in recovery capacity, intrinsic health, functional realization, and intergenerational reserve. It argues that the central task of 21st-century governance is semantic before it is technical: to reinstall capacity over output, recovery over throughput, and life-course solvency over quarterly performance. Only through this reversal can development be reconciled with health, and economics with biology.

Read More

Selected Talks on the Geopolitics of Global Peace, Security and Sustainable Development by Prof Jeffrey Sachs (2023)

Jeffrey Sachs is a world-renowned economics professor, bestselling author, and global leader in sustainable development. Sachs serves as the Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, where he holds the rank of University Professor. Sachs was the Director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University from 2002 to 2016. Prior to Columbia, Sachs spent over twenty years as a professor at Harvard University, including as the Galen L. Stone Professor of International Trade. Sachs has authored and edited numerous books, including three New York Times bestsellers: The End of Poverty (2005), Common Wealth: Economics for a Crowded Planet (2008), and The Price of Civilization (2011). He is the recipient of several international prizes and has advised several governments across the globe. Prof Sachs has also served as the Special Advisor to UN Secretaries-General Kofi Annan, Ban Ki-moon, and António Guterres.

Read More

“Eating Our Way to Sustainability? Leisure, Food and Community Economic Development” by Jennifer Sumner

Reproduced from: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1422/htm Sustainability 2018, 10(5), 1422; doi: 10.3390/su10051422 Concept Paper Eating Our Way to Sustainability? Leisure, Food and Community Economic Development Jennifer Sumner Adult Education and Community Development Program, OISE/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6, Canada Received: 24 March 2018 / Accepted: 2 May 2018 / Published: 4 May 2018 Abstract This article reviews and… Read More

Sustainable Development, Wellbeing and Material Consumption: A Stoic Perspective

Since the introduction of neoclassical economic theory, material wealth and accumulation have been linked to hedonic wellbeing. In turn, Utilitarian notions have generated the belief that infinite growth is not only good but necessary for society to prosper. Unsurprisingly, this belief system has supported the considerable depletion of natural resources and has not always led to social equitability or environmental justice, two pillars of sustainable development. Given these limitations, this paper looks into eudaimonic wellbeing, as defined by Stoicism. The latter originating in Classical Greece and Ancient Rome, has been used throughout the centuries to discuss and support the flourishing of individuals, but has rarely been applied to collective wellbeing. Consequently, we explore whether, and to what extent, this virtue-based philosophy can answer questions regarding the value and the role of material acquisition in societal development, as directed by sustainable policy. We propose the idea that the Stoic emphasis on prudence, self-control, courage and justice, as the only means to achieve “happiness”, is intrinsically linked to sustainable wellbeing and that its principles can be used to demonstrate that society does not require limitless growth to flourish. Read More